Original Message 1/7                 Date: 17-Jan-02  @  04:04 PM   -   Hmmm..

Maarten

Posts: 2082

Link?: Link

File?:  [image]

[image file]

....Drums....?....

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 2/7                 Date: 17-Jan-02  @  05:48 PM   -   RE: Hmmm..

Milikee

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file

Uh-oh...
Waldorf turns E-Mu repackaging.

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 3/7                 Date: 17-Jan-02  @  07:12 PM   -   RE: Hmmm..

milan

Posts: 5701

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file

or maarten turns to photoshop?  

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 4/7                 Date: 17-Jan-02  @  08:00 PM   -   RE: Hmmm..

blacktrax

Posts: 472

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

http://www.waldorf-music.de/rackattack/

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 5/7                 Date: 17-Jan-02  @  08:39 PM   -   RE: Hmmm..

nothingnewhere

Posts: 646

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

very cool. from the specs it looks like its just a repackaged, un-keyboard-playable uQ though.

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 6/7                 Date: 18-Jan-02  @  06:06 PM   -   RE: Hmmm..

Pongoid

Posts: 2003

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

If it's anything like the plugin, it may be a cool tool, but just about everyting you can do with the attack, you could do with the Q or uQ quite easily. Maybe a it's a budget move, or tool for audiophiles? I've got enough waldorf for the moment to want to avoid redundency. Hartmann, on the other hand.....I've GOT to check out.

Ape

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 7/7                 Date: 18-Jan-02  @  10:34 PM     Edit: 18-Jan-02  |  10:35 PM   -   RE: Hmmm..

nothingnewhere

Posts: 646

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

im pretty sure that its this uses the same exact hardware (dsp wise) as the uQ, but with new software. plus it oughtta be cheaper than a uQ so it would still be worth buying.

[ back to forum ]               [quote]