0  |  skin: 1 2 3  | Login | Join  | 

Audioindy.com

Mail discussion to a friend Search forums House rules Live chat Login to access your admin About 7161 forums Forum home New Topic

Forums   -   Mixing & FX

Subject: Seeking TRANCE


Viewing all 35 messages  -  View by pages of 10:  1 2 3 4


Original Message 1/35                 Date: 30-Nov-00  @  12:49 AM   -   Seeking TRANCE

Choknow

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



I'm totally new to this world of making music. I'm very interested though. I need a starting point. I need to know what equipment I need and how I go about in creating this wonderful sound they call TRANCE.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 2/35                 Date: 30-Nov-00  @  12:58 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

influx

Posts: 7627

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



uh. some drugs?



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 3/35                 Date: 30-Nov-00  @  06:41 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

damballah

Posts: 1675

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



you may want to try asking in the 'music and tech chat' area. you'll get more, ahem, abuse, err, I mean answers, over there.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 4/35                 Date: 01-Dec-00  @  06:12 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

casparproject

Posts:

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Get fruityloops, do a search for it, DL
it, learn to master it, read about it,
decide whether you have any interest
in caryying on, if you do, come back
and lurk and learn.

Peaceout,

Peter



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 5/35                 Date: 02-Dec-00  @  03:22 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

carbonize

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Trance isen't to hard to compose. But in order to make good trance you must have cool sound quality which is kinda hard tog et with softsynths   I do recommend also though that you try softies at first, then if you know you wanna work with music the next years then you start thinking about equipment   people seems to tend starting at buying a synth or a synthmodule. 2 approaches here. Analog (analog modeling) or digital rom based stuff. so the difference is that the analog modeling "CREATES" a sound when you tweak knobs and buttons on it. Rom based synth often contains good or better drums, strings, guitars and "normal"instruments while analog makes leads, pads and other weird and cool shit. To become more pro'ish you probably gonna need one of each. An ideal trance setup for me is: one rom based bynth, one analog modeler, a great mixer with good EQ, a sampler and a fast computer   with this kind of hardware you can produce awesome trance hehe. But it would probably cost you about 4000$ to buy em all hehe.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 6/35                 Date: 02-Dec-00  @  06:31 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

k

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



i dont know about that... soft-snths are very powerful



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 7/35                 Date: 02-Dec-00  @  08:13 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

casparproject

Posts:

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



I'm kinda wondering more about the "Trance isn't that hard to compose" comment. Sure, it's not hard if you either know what you're doing, or you rip shit off from other ppl.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 8/35                 Date: 03-Dec-00  @  02:39 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

k

Posts:

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



there's some softsynth trance sounds obviously it's a demo so i mixed the drums down etc.. the full-detail 800kb file is available for download for your listening perusal over in the ORION thread on the PC chat forum, i'm impressed, it is again it's own synth like a hardware is it's own synth, you do with it what you need to do to get the sound shapes you want, the rest is the s/w's character - these sounds is a 3 osc synth, 3 note poly so it coulkd be way fatter if layered ...whatever you know all the things you can do..

these sounds have delay & a touch of reverb only, no compresion etc - i could plug dx & vst fx in series with these sounds with a higher power pc, which gladly is coming next week at last so i can get deeper into producing with the s/w's.... quite interesting stuff it all is, it's nice to programme sounds whilst chilling on the bed horizontal with cans on which is how these sounds were made



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 9/35                 Date: 29-Dec-00  @  03:42 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

stephen.ayres

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



To the guy named `carbonise` and anyone else who thinks Trance is easy to write. It isn`t.
If you think trance is easy to write then you are writing s*it trance. I have been producing dance music in recording studio`s for over 7 years and in the last 2 years I have seen a massive step in technology and musical integrity in this area. Trance is at the pinnacle of synth technology, you cannot right proper trance with one analogue synth or a just a PC. My studio has 7 hardware synths (analogue and digital) and I am still not happy with my sound. In order to create depth, expression and all of the collages of arps and melodies and sweeps required you need a big synth budget, alot of outboard, a good 8-bus desk and damn good set of monitors to get your mix through.
Period.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 10/35                 Date: 29-Dec-00  @  08:07 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

Defector Z

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Can I get an amen from the congregation?!



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 11/35                 Date: 29-Dec-00  @  08:07 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

The Congregation

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



AMEN!



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 12/35                 Date: 31-Dec-00  @  02:42 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

sitar

Posts: 3872

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



I find it intriguing how the definition of 'compose has changed'. A composer at one time wrote music, musicians played it, and the recording technicians made it sound as good as could be. Nowadays composing is all of the above. In a sense from the 'composer' of old point of view trance is not that difficult to compose. What it sounds like stephen is talking about is the present definition of composing which in the case of trance requires a heavy emphasis on the technician side of composing. Maybe the difference of opinion is more in the definition of 'compose'. I'm not taking either side here mind you. It's just a brave new world.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 13/35                 Date: 01-Jan-01  @  01:14 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

r-tek

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



I dont think *any* style is easy to do well."...you need a big synth budget, alot of outboard, a good 8-bus desk and damn good set of monitors to get your mix through. Period." .....you missed out talent, always helps .....more helpful than a massive studio investment.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 14/35                 Date: 01-Jan-01  @  06:24 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

k

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



in some respect thats true.. trance is the most synth intensive music, but with hard disk and talent you can do it with less gear than you think, but that all depends on wether you are trying to compete soundwise with top selling artists with huge studio setups... trance has a lower end of the mrket too with less gloss.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 15/35                 Date: 06-Jan-01  @  06:12 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

freon

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



isn't the sonic character of trance pretty important...i mean...after programming awesome intros, builds and breaks...the sonic quality of trance is to me, most important...latley I have been focusing on that. awesome sonic recording....I have some examples up on mp3...
http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/192/ddjfreon.html

I really tried to go sonic here. check out all the tracks...maybe use really good headphones.





[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 16/35                 Date: 07-Jan-01  @  10:22 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

k

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



sure, and alot of that is down to the scales & notes working in layers - 44 partts of analog modelling should be good to get a pretty deep trancxe sound if u use fx and mix well and use some programme changes to switch sounds.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 17/35                 Date: 07-Jan-01  @  10:22 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

k

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



sorry - that should be - 4 parts



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 18/35                 Date: 08-Jan-01  @  08:54 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

influx

Posts: 7627

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



44 parts? Jesus  when I read that...damn..imagine trying to mix that. Im too dumb

glad you clarified. even though I dont write trance



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 19/35                 Date: 13-Jan-01  @  08:50 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

phunkytek

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



I'm having the hardest time getting the sonic quality there. I like my arrangments and sounds. My mixes sound off and lack the flatness and warmth of the tracks I like. I want my mix and master to sound like Sasha Ibiza, disc 2 track 03. warm lows. flat hats, sparkleing arps. I have been using wavelab, but don't really know anything about mastering. The only plug in that makes my tracks sound better is the peak master and eq. What plugs-ins should i be using , and in what order in the singnal path. where do I start and what should lead up to the limiter.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 20/35                 Date: 30-Jan-01  @  12:41 AM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

stephen

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Alright Phunkytek

A limiter will not help you really. The sort of sound your after is only really available with very expensive equipment.

Sash!`s music is produced in a studio armed with lots of analogue and digital synths loads of valve gear and a huge arsen of sounds.

So many different areas of the production process add to this level of sound quality.

The programmers who did that album have years of experience, they know how to program sounds exactly to fit those gaps in the tunes.

The first thing you need to learn is how to program an analogue synth. Every single parameter on a synth should be understood by the programmer, nothing should be ignored and then your creativity is only restricted my your imagination.

With regards to mixing you can, mix to a reasonable quality on a decent 8 bus desk (Mackie, Spirit, Studiomaster etc), but your sound will always lack the warmth of a bigger desk with a better eq. This isn`t always a bad thing, many trance producers (John Digweed, Ferry Corsten, Steve Helstrip etc) use a desk like the above. But their sound is always alot thinner than a Sash!`s mix, listen, use your ears.

Valve equipment is the key to Sash!`s sound, every sound in his mixes has been processed heavily, but don`t think that you need that level of power to write a good tune.

A skilled engineer with a reasonable setup can still produce a convincing mix, just like all of the above, minus the warmth tho...



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 21/35                 Date: 30-Jan-01  @  12:07 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

fink

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



i just stumbled on this thread. although i don't really like sash i know his music is well produced and recorded.

can anyone elaborate on what a home producer can use to help achieve these results.

i have a really old studiomaster mixer, 3630 compressor and quadraverb. that's it!!

so first change the mixer?? analogue or digital? this subject is now begining to grate on me, what do the pros use still, analogue i bet!?? more outboard??

my finished tunes sound to me to be a bit two dimensional if you know what i mean. and also lacking a little bit of
depth if you know what i mean.

what should i purchase in the future given i'm not a multi million pound studio.

cheers



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 22/35                 Date: 30-Jan-01  @  03:22 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

ville

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



So tell me are you talkin about Sash
(Equadoooooor) or Sasha.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 23/35                 Date: 30-Jan-01  @  06:40 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

GT

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Waves is a good start. Dynamic only the individual tracks, BUT leave the Stereo out for someone at a mastering house...tuned room etc and that's all the guys does.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 24/35                 Date: 31-Jan-01  @  02:40 PM   -   RE: Trance/Dance production tips

stephen

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Sorry I was listenin to Sash the other day and assumed you were talking about him!!

To Fink,

The key to good production is down to two things, `skill` and `experience`. I know how difficult and frustrating it is when you start out and listen to all these records and can`t work out how it is done.

You don`t say what synths you have in your studio, as the key to good dance production is sounds. You can`t write a riff without the correct sound and this should always be your starting point when writing a tune.

Build up percussion layers first, find a good drum loop and then look for bass and synth sounds to layer ontop of these, ensuring that your riffs and melodies are constructed around the groove of the percussion. Everything should sit together and there`s should be no pauses or 16th note gaps at all (this is very important in dance, riffs should play off other riffs and phrases and sounds should answer each other)

Your musical structure should always work in 8 bar segments. In dance everything changes on the 8, either an additional layer comes in, or a layer is removed, depend on where the tune is going and what stage it is at. This maintains constant interest through out the piece.

God! I`m letting out a lot of secrets here, must go now as I`m stringin together another phat cut as we speak...

See ya.
Steve



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 25/35                 Date: 31-Jan-01  @  11:57 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

k

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



ggod advice on the layers stuff from steve... also compressors on dedicated tracks for bass, sub synth/s & some of the drums, plus dedicated good mixer channels to go with and decent fx help... plus some overall master 'tuning' with a 'warmer', stereo enhancer & something to 'thump' it up a bit beefier... all blend to make a track that 'hums' in the lower end, but the mixing is the point where that happens i reckon.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 26/35                 Date: 01-Feb-01  @  11:23 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

stephen

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Yea the mix is obviously paramount when constructing a tune.

Try to think about your mix as you write. Really the mix should not be a great hassle if you have prepared for it in the earlier processes of a tune.

The key to this is selecting and programming sounds that fit before grabbing eq and fx.

Using filters, amp and filter envs to shape your sounds is all part of getting the mix spot on.

Many people wonder why their mixes sound so messing without realising that you can`t fix a badly programmed sound with eq. When all of your sounds are put together they should sound almost mixed before even approaching the desk.

Sounds and programming is the most important part of mixing as this is the source of your signal and the deskeq should only be used to gently enhance or reduce certain frequencies which may need slight attention.

I might chat about compression tomorrow as the wrong technique can fuck things up quite considerably, but the right technique can allow you to have a mix which would hardly need any work in the post production stage.

Cheers all,
Steve



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 27/35                 Date: 02-Feb-01  @  01:40 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

ville

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Tell us more steve!!! Another bed time story please.

People allways say that make beat and bass work together which propably means that they shouldn't overlap each other's frequencies.
Which one should (generally) be lower? and how do you know that they are "working together" besides each one can be heard clearly when playing at the same time? Is that essential?
sometimes when i drop out some part suddenly another (which i had forgotten)stands out very clearly. Is it a sign of bad mixing?

I know this is very hard to discuss when not hearing actual thing.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 28/35                 Date: 02-Feb-01  @  02:35 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

Jasper

Posts: 424

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



you need some overlap if you want that rolling bass off the kick effect, also helps to get a good tuning on the kick.




[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 29/35                 Date: 02-Feb-01  @  11:29 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

stephen

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Ville,

I think I know what your hitting on.

What your saying is how do you balance a low frequency kick drum over a low frequency sub/synth bass sound and allow the two to work together?

This all depends on what style of music you are writing. Generally for music based around break beats I would say put the kick slightly above the sub bass by tuning it up a bit and using a touch of eq.

The problem with stuff like this is there are no real rules. Another thing to be aware of is that your average listener sometimes refers to certain sounds as bass, but they arn`t actually bass.

You can put a kick in a tune and boost the lower midz and slam a really deep sub bass underneath it to fill out the bottom. Drum and Bass producers often use this approach.

Or sometimes the reverse is better. You might want to have a really muffled detuned, deep, muddy kick and a lighter bass sound (say an acoustic bass) grooving over the top. Hip hop tunes often use this technique.

At the end of the day it`s all down to the sounds you use and what effect you`re after. Sometimes if your tune is really minimal you might want to mould the kick and the bass into one and let them play off each other as each note hits the floor, as you described above. A Tribe Called Quest did this in their Find A Way track and the tune is just bass, bass, bass!! Same with a lot fo Q-Tips stuff, check Vibrant Thing.

I`ve just reread your message an noticed something else that might be causing your problem.

If sounds are jump out when other sounds are not playing then yes this is definately a mix issue. Difficult for me to answer because I don`t know what you`re monitoring on, but generally try not to boast to much bass and definately cut bass off other sounds in your tune to allow the bottom to bleed from the bass sounds and not the other instruments.

All mid range sounds will have a fundemental freqency in the bottom and you need to remove some of this with eq so the bottom end from your bass sounds are clear and not mushing up with every thing else.

Try to flatten things out nicely by cutting more than boasting and don`t over do any sounds.

If your using monitors then my rule to you is -

`Keep it flat, keep it smooth and it will transfer`.

Best regards,
Steve

p.s I actually write dance music, although I have referenced against other stuff above and maybe setting up a website soon with loads of info to try and help people through this frustrating stuff, watch this space....



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 30/35                 Date: 03-Feb-01  @  08:14 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

influx

Posts: 7627

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



uh oh...competition for kilo 

how bout just writing articles HERE! theres space for it



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 31/35                 Date: 04-Feb-01  @  06:28 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

k

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



ville it is completely wrong to think: "make beat and bass work together which propably means that they shouldn't overlap each other's frequencies. " - - you need to make all the parts gel to make the groove happen and this may involve the total opposite, it may require some bass & drum parts become merged and loose all their individual definition, but the grrove rocks along and jumps... newbies always make the mistake to 'think' about their eq, to and extent this 'cerebral' approach is not good... newbies always try to mix everything so it can be heard distinctly in the mix... wrong!

also how far apart the monitors are makeas a hell of a difference....sitting behind your mixer about 4-5 feet from the speaker shelf they should be like 7 feet apart or so... not closer.... but experiment with a CD you like playing thru the speakers,,,,,, move them apart and check the mix, move them toghether... find the sweet spot!! -- too close and you loose stereo definition but also it changes the center point sound which is where the the bass/groove energy resides - to far apart and the middle of the mix starts to dissapear and again you are mixing to what you hear so you over emphasis the center 'punch' to compensate for it's 'dissapearence' and end up with again a crappy mix

having your speakers on the longest wall of the room helps the sound, like dont stuff your studio up into the small end of the room lengthways, use the width of the room - putting your tape & book shelves etc behind you facing the speakers helps to break up waves hitting the back wall.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 32/35                 Date: 06-Feb-01  @  03:19 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

ville

Posts:

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



Thanks for tips. I'm using Yamaha msp10 monitor which are IMHO quite good.

I got to admit K that i'm "thinking" my EQ. Too much i guess. I'm watching the faders and counting frequencies. Really stupid when i think of it now...
(Trying to make everything to be heard is propably too problem of mixing one's own material.Guilty as charged anyway)
I live in metric system for gods sake!!!! Damn feets and pounds  
I'll have to experiment with my "sweet spot" some more (no not that!)

Lately i've been struggling with the mix of one new track ("Squeez") but i just can't get bass right. Low offbeat "ooomph" seems to disappear when other instruments come in and at the end of the track it jumps out again. Besides i've have to leave that track to rest for a while becasue i have started to dislike it.
Not just selfish promoting but humbly asking for opinion... (above link)



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 33/35                 Date: 06-Feb-01  @  06:40 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

k

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



hmm... thats a really good organic track actually, people would oplay that but the joins seem a bit hurried, it doesnt change sections very smoothly... bits dont come in/out at resolved bars so you loose the 'anticipation' factor



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 34/35                 Date: 07-Feb-01  @  07:30 PM   -   RE: Production stuff

stephen

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Ville,

The reason why your bass is getting muddy and losing power when extra sounds are added is because those extra sounds are carry too much bottom end and are cancelling out and distorting the bass frequencies from your offbeat bass.

The answer to this is to cut bass off those other sounds. Thin them out! People always thing in terms of addition when mixing, but cutting bass from one sound will allow other sounds to be heard clearer in the mix.

Your bottom end generally starts at about 300hz, so get all of your (assuming you`re writing trance) arps, pads and whatever else and cut about minus 2-3db off bottom of all of those sounds using a low shelving eq or a high pass filter.

Once the bottom has been removed from these components of your tune you`ll find that your mix will have headroom once again and the bass sound should reappear again.

Then it`s just a case of balancing things until everything has it own level of power.

Try and reduce things as much as you can with eq to the point where it is almost compromising sound quality, this will give you much more space/headroom in the mix.

Good luck!
Steve



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 35/35                 Date: 14-Feb-01  @  11:13 PM   -   RE: Seeking TRANCE

Groovejetter

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



I`ve just read through these threads and found some really interesting info. Has nobody got anything else to say?
Steve you seem to know quite a bit about producing/engineering,what music do you write? I have loads of questions I wouldn`t mind asking.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Viewing all 35 messages  -  View by pages of 10:  1 2 3 4

There are 35 total messages for this topic





Reply to Thread

You need to register/login to use the forum.

Click here  to Signup or Login !

[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]



Back to Forum