Message 65/188
Date: 13-Sep-02 @ 02:59 PM -
RE: september 11th
ok so which islamic nations that now exist are not going to want to spread their religion by violence?
turkey is about the only one i can think of...
its not because islam is bad blah blah whatever its because the fundementalists of islam end up controlling popular thought and regiems of government.
let me ask a very simple question.
once the population of britain reaches 50% muslim (1 decade, 2? who knows) what mechanisms are in place to keep the government intact?
the same goes for any country that allows 'religious freedom'... what is keeping religous freedom laws intact? its the will of the people in those countries.
china has NO religous freedom. people are killed there every single day of the year for having a belief system outside what the communist party allows.
sudan, malaysia, etc same story. people who choose not to follow islam are killed.
once your population hits 50% (or whatever is needed for legislative change in your particular country) you will see a change happen.
we aren't that far removed from all this stuff.
people didn't have freedom of religion in the 1500s... you were whatever religion your country said you were or you were KILLED....
the muslim world has world conquest in mind (peacefully for some, violently for others) but you can be sure they will not tolerate religious freedom in any place where they can oust it.
i am not worried about the 'peaceful' muslims that cnn interviews. i work with them and know they are not out to get me. we have good conversations about religion and such. they obviously are not fundmentalists. but how far away is any religious person from becoming fundementalist when the right situation presents itself??????
i am worried more about the fastest growing religion in the world and how in nearly every single instance that a country becomes muslim, all other religious freedoms are banished.
jamey