Message 20/48
Date: 20-Apr-10 @ 12:24 AM -
RE: damn
i'm thinking 'sound on sound' should have been named 'sound sound'. you know like a sound theory
or sound ideas and sound as in what our ears put up with all day long. just think of the money the
mag would have saved on ink by omitting the word *on* over time and the printing of millions of
mags. and don't get me wrong, it's a great mag but what does 'sound on sound' mean? is the owner
of the mag "Samuel Sound" or something? now the acronym SOS makes sense. heaven knows my
tracks needed more SOS than one magazine could possibly offer but I doubt they named their mag
so they'd have a cool acronym. and since you've all asked whats up with the name "future music" i'll
shed some light. no fucking clue. you could write a renaissance track for crumhorn, psaltery,
recorder, percussion...oh and if you ever wanted to know where drummer jokes got their start....
click and let's not forget *bladderpipe* (a real pisser playing that), and if you haven't uploaded the track yet
to dancetech it qualifies as future music and yet i never saw an ad for any of that kit in the mag.
now that you think i've totally changed the present topic here's where i'm going with all of this. my
forum posts have always been far more entertaining than my tracks. more people posted in the
forum when i was posting tracks. since i stopped posting tracks more people are listening to the
track list. coincidence? i think not. if i start posting tracks again i guarantee listenership will drop and
people will be back in the forum.