0  |  skin: 1 2 3  | Login | Join  | 

Audioindy.com

Mail discussion to a friend Search forums House rules Live chat Login to access your admin About 7161 forums Forum home New Topic

Forums   -   The lounge

Subject: One Iraqi-american & a bird


Pages: 1 2 3


Original Message                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  07:19 AM   -   One Iraqi-american & a bird

Jon s

Posts:

Link?:  Link
File?:  No file




http://komo1000news.com/audio/kvi_aircheck_031003.mp3


One true Iraqi gent and a mindless bird have a go.

Remember this guy's words when you see those "me too" protesters on the streets...they're (unknowingly) promoting slaughter everyday by letting saddam stay in power.



[ back to forum ]                           [quote]

Message 11/30                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  10:32 AM   -   RE: One Iraqi-american & a bird

k

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



The thing is Jon... remember BEFORE 9/11?...

so the huge ww global anti-US & anti-corp protests were fiction?... so much anti feeling that the G7 c*nts were going to have to meet in the middle of the ing rocky mountains surrounded by army guards?

you think that all went away?

do you live in a ing cave?

Stop buying The Sun mebbe?



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 12/30                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  10:42 AM   -   RE: One Iraqi-american & a bird

Jon

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Tell us how you *really* feel about a free world and economy?  


Sounds like you and Zazza would like to see Iraq left alone...free for saddam to run the country amok. And you are truly fooled by "me too" protests, whereby numbers attempt to persuade minds, I've got a Big Ben clock to sell you, on the cheap even. Socialist power! (repeat repeat)



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 13/30                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  01:32 PM   -   RE: One Iraqi-american & a bird

Def Z

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Zazza - you raise some good arguments. But the thing that I can't quite figure out, is when you talk about an opportunity to create a new world order based on law, why was the UN so unable to act? The opportunity has been there for 12 years (since the last Gulf War, anyways) for law to be enforced, but there was little to no attempt to fix the problem. Putting aside the fact that the US supported Iraq for many years (I'm familiar with Cold War foreign policy), it doesn't change the fact that the UN (can we agree that this is the world governing body?) was not able to do ANYTHING. It wasn't until our chickens came home to roost on Sept 11 that the US really started pushing for action.

Yes, I understand that the US has supported many of the people who are doing bad things, but does that mean that these people should be left alone 20 years after the fact? Maybe I'm missing the argument but it sounds to me like you're saying "well, the US supported Saddam, so they shouldn't be involved in trying to fix the problem that they created. Let's leave him alone and hope he gets better on this own." Perhaps I'm missing the point, but I don't see a better option. I have tried to pay attention to the anti-war protests, but I can't find a solution to the Saddam problem. Is he a threat to his neighbors and/or the rest of us? I think so - to the point that he needs to be removed from power. The anti-war protests haven't provided a clear alternative.

Sanctions haven't worked as Saddam is going around them with the help of France and Russia. The money he is getting is not helping the vast Iraqi middle class, rather it's building him new palaces. International pressure hasn't worked (UN). I'm not quite sure that too many NGO aid groups would make it out of Iraq alive. I just don't see any other options.

Based on the websites you posted Zazza, I could see that someone could reach the conclusion that the US CREATED these problems (in Iraq, for example) 20+ years ago in order for a few big oil and munitions companies to increase their payouts to shareholders. I guess I have a REAL hard time believing that.

And believe me, there is NOTHING I would like to see more than consistency in US foreign policy. What I'd also like to see are other countries helping the cause. I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't know about other countries putting forth a HUGE humanitarian effort to help the countries you mentioned. Why does the rest of the world expect the US to do it all, as you clearly point out it should?

It seems to me that the US and UK tried and tried to get the world to back the international pressure it put on Saddam, but too many other countries wouldn't stand behind the paper they signed. Do you suppose the countries in question didn't stand up because the US put Pinochet in Chile and then supported his reign of terror? Or sold Saddam all this bad stuff in 1980 to fight Iran? Or because the US isn't trying to invade North Korth because they have nucs too? Or perhaps it's because the US helped install the Shah of Iran in the 50s?

These are all good reasons to hate the foreign policy of the US (and I do, especially so after Sept 11 because it is no secret to me why the US was targeted), but it doesn't help to solve the problem of Saddam. UNLESS you think that the US intentionally created Saddam 20+ years ago in order for George W. Bush and Dick Chenney to reap the rewards with the Halliburton shares.

Or, my entire understanding of the world is wrong. At which point, I'll cry.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 14/30                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  01:48 PM     Edit: 24-Mar-03  |  01:50 PM   -   RE: One Iraqi-american & a bird

Zazza

Posts: 1502

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



The USA's aid, in terms of percentage of their GDP is already lowest of any industrialized nation in the world.

http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Debt/USAid.asp

The US and the UK have consistently undermined the UN.. the US vetoing any number of resolutions designed to resolve the Israel, Palestine situation..

Again no-one argues that Sadaam is not a cruel and vicious dictator, just the about the means of dealing with him and similar tyrants around the world.

Given that the US and the UK have been manipulating the situation in the Middle East for the last century, and that the current mess is the result, maybe it is time to try another approach. If you think that the current action in Iraq will bring peace to the region I believe you are mistaken.

Unfortunately, the ties between money and power especially in the US means that decisions are made for then profit of the few and not for the human rights of the many. A simple study of the historic involvement of the US and the UK in the Middle East, Third World and Latin America will show this to be the case..

Unsurprisingly, this history of murder, assasination, destablisation, exploitation and lies has not endeared many people outside the US to these policies.

I think it is time for the people to wrest power from these murderous, dead-souled creatures so the foreign policies of these nations can express the basic good nature and principles of the populations.

To do that, we need to educate ourselves beyond the bland, media-fed garbage that is dished out to us.

Re your comments about aid:

http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Debt/USAid.asp



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 15/30                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  02:01 PM   -   RE: One Iraqi-american & a bird

Def Z

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Zazza - I'm reading your link.

Okay - so lets say (for the sake of argument) I jump on the anti-war bandwagon. Someone is bound to ask me "er, what are the alternatives?" What would my answer be?



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 16/30                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  02:22 PM   -   RE: One Iraqi-american & a bird

Zazza

Posts: 1502

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Set up an international court, issue legal edicts to freeze assets of any dictators judged to be in contravention of an international (not US/UK) definition of 'human rights'.

Refuse to do business with dictatorships, rather than selling them weapons and doing 'under-the-carpet' deals between large corporations and those nations with tacit governmental approval.

Actively support exsiting democratic governments, even if that means US corporations lose some of their profits.. (see Venezuela).

Stop driving third world nations into poverty through aggressive IMF and World Bank/Free Trade/IPR (Intellectual Property Rights) agreements which simply destroy the local economies, again for the benefit of western corporations.

Allow third world nations to either produce or buy generic alternatives to Aids drugs etc when they cannot afford to buy at the inflated prices charged by western pharmaceutical companies.

All these measures and more will have a profound efect on the way the world views the west and the US and UK in particular.

Currently, the US has refused to join the International Court, blocked the sale of cheap AIDS drugs, sidelined the UN and either opted out of, or actively opposed most initiatives of this nature. This stance can usually, if not always, be traced back to powerful industry lobbies in the US.

And, don't fall for the trick of letting the US/UK set the agenda, i.e. 'Why Don't we go in and try to wrest power from Sadaam the evil dictator'

The question might be rephrased as:

'Haven't we learnt from the last hundred years of history that going into Middle-Eastern ountries and installing puppet goverments has yielded nothing but dictatorships, repression, despair, misery and instability, why do we want to do it again?'

And do NOT fall for the moral argument, which is laughable to put it politely..

How would the US react/vote in the UN if Russia decided to go in and liberate Iran on the same basis? (Or indeed any other country)

It is against the UN charter to invade sovereign states.. otherwise we open a Pandora's box and every contry with an agenda will be doing it in the name of 'Truth, Justice and the (insert country's name here) way.'

The US is currently the most powerful country in the world, it should lead by example, not through the use of military force.

That military might should be used in the defence of the principles of democracy and freedom, not as a blunt instrument to further the geo-political ambitions of power-crazed individuals.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 17/30                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  03:01 PM   -   RE: One Iraqi-american & a bird

BJT

Posts: 90

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file



Yeah is that on topic for ya Jon?!?



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 18/30                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  05:17 PM   -   RE: One Iraqi-american & a bird

influx

Posts: 7627

Link?: Link

File?:  No file



NICE zazza

its so easy to bitch but to offer solutions, especially ones that SEEM (heh, on paper) so truly simple and effective..well...good on ya.

Jon...the arrogance of your ignorance is appalling. Yet another lemming who thinks everything is ok and the people in power got there due to their virtue and desire for good.

piss off



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 19/30                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  06:26 PM   -   RE: One Iraqi-american & a bird

knowa

Posts:

Link?:  Link

File?:  No file



zazza for president. thank you for spelling it out quite nicely.

"US intentionally created (bad thing) in order for (rich people) to reap the rewards with the (any company) shares."

this sounds farfetched to you? I mean, nobody can predict all the details, but if the arming of a dictator is profitable, he gets armed. if the destruction of his country is profitable, he gets bombed. I'm not sure I understand the confusion.



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 20/30                 Date: 24-Mar-03  @  07:05 PM     Edit: 24-Mar-03  |  11:49 PM   -   RE: One Iraqi-american & a bird

Zazza

Posts: 1502

Link?:  No link

File?:  File



ADD_FILE.TXT

Well, now it seems that that other hotbed of power-crazed loonies is at it.. the Russians are supplying the Iraqis with GPS jamming technology..

This makes the smart bombs dumb...

Could this be them getting their own back for the US supplying arms and money to resistance fighters in Afghanistan for all that time?

Personally I'm issuing a 'Brown Alert' which indicates that vast amounts of bullshit is heading our way from a number of obvious sources... and that all conscious beings should immediately duct tape our heads to prevent contamination..

Oh, and by the way, acording to Fox News, all peace protestors are 'anarchists'..?

Presumably for advocating the rule of law over the rule of military might...



[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Pages: 1 2 3

There are 30 total messages for this topic





Reply to Thread

You need to register/login to use the forum.

Click here  to Signup or Login !

[you'll be brought right back to this point after signing up]



Back to Forum