Original Message 1/10                 Date: 25-Mar-03  @  10:34 AM   -   For Christ's sake, not him again!

Filthy McNasty

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file

Yes, its me again. Back with another question that's probably been asked loads. Anyway.....

I'm trying to get my verb pre delay in time with my track. So, I've gone to that chart in the table section and worked out....

My tracks are always at 125bpm. I've caculated that pre delay should be

1/4 48ms


1/8 24ms


1/16 12ms


1/32 6ms


Is that right?

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 2/10                 Date: 25-Mar-03  @  11:50 AM   -   RE: For Christ's sake, not him again!

milan

Posts: 5701

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

there's a delay time calculator up there^^^ in the tech tables section^^^ click click  

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 3/10                 Date: 25-Mar-03  @  11:55 AM   -   RE: For Christ's sake, not him again!

Stefan

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file

No, it isn't ;-)

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 4/10                 Date: 25-Mar-03  @  12:14 PM   -   RE: For Christ's sake, not him again!

Ragnar0k

Posts: 507

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

Hi Filthy!

hmmm...
125 beats per minute. 1 beat is one 1/4th note (I assume signature is 4/4)

So 125 1/4th per minute, lets divide this by 60, thats 2.0833 1/4th note per second.

Take 1 / 2.0833, thats 0.48 (the length of one 1/4th note is seconds).

If you multiply that w 1000 you get the length of a quarter note in ms.

480 ms voila. I hope I didn't fucked it up  

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 5/10                 Date: 25-Mar-03  @  12:32 PM   -   RE: For Christ's sake, not him again!

milan

Posts: 5701

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

well if you had looked it up in the tables section you would have known if you were right by now. (which you were, btw  )

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 6/10                 Date: 25-Mar-03  @  01:05 PM   -   RE: For Christ's sake, not him again!

Filthy McNasty

Posts:

Link?:  No link

File?:  No file

So I was right then Cool. You girlz never give a straight answer. You make people work for it. :-)

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 7/10                 Date: 25-Mar-03  @  01:21 PM   -   RE: For Christ's sake, not him again!

milan

Posts: 5701

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

yup, just like FM  

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 8/10                 Date: 25-Mar-03  @  02:18 PM     Edit: 25-Mar-03  |  02:22 PM   -   RE: For Christ's sake, not him again!

Ragnar0k

Posts: 507

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

"I've CALCULATED that pre delay should be..."

Oh, and by the way, why don't you just use your ears?

:-)

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 9/10                 Date: 25-Mar-03  @  05:13 PM   -   RE: For Christ's sake, not him again!

psylichon

Posts: 4573

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

'sbeen posted before but 'sgood. ^^^^

Also, an easy way to find a quarter note in ms is divide 60,000 by the tempo. Divide or multiply that further to get other note values.

psy

[ back to forum ]               [quote]

Message 10/10                 Date: 25-Mar-03  @  07:30 PM   -   RE: For Christ's sake, not him again!

Pongoid

Posts: 2003

Link?: Link

File?:  No file

yup, use your ears, cuz simply nailing things spot on the timing thing does not necessarily give you anything you couldn't get by just adding another note with reduced volume in the same place. It's the fact that the timing is not perfect, giving it an advanced or delayed reproduction that makes delay useful in the first place. So...use your ears and adjust the times to what feels correct in the given context.

Ape

[ back to forum ]               [quote]